BART Pulls a Mubarak in San Francisco

This week, EFF has seen censorship stories move closer and closer to home —
first Iran, then the UK, and now San Francisco, an early locus of the modern
free speech movement. Operators of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system (BART)
shut down cell phone service to four stations in downtown San Francisco
yesterday in response to a planned protest. Last week, protesters disrupted
BART service in response to the fatal shooting of Charles Blair Hill by BART
police on July 3rd. Thursday’s protest failed to materialize, possibly because
the disruption of cell phone service made organization and coordination difficult.

Early reports indicated that BART cut off cell phone service by approaching
carriers directly and asking them to turn service off. Later statements by
James Allison, deputy chief communications officer for BART, assert
“BART staff or contractors shut down power to the nodes and alerted the
cell carriers” after the fact. AT&T, Sprint, Verizon, and T-Mobile have not
yet made comment as to whether or not they were complicit in the shutdown.

Obviously, we’d like to know exactly what the carriers said to BART, but many
other unanswered questions remain as well. Was pulling the plug on people’s
phones a quick, on-the-spot decision, or part of a protest-response plan vetted
by BART’s lawyers? Who decided that blocking all cellphone calls at these BART
stations was the right response to news that there might be a protest? Were the
carriers ever in the loop about this plan or action? Who decided that the news
of this planned protest justified the shutdown? How do we know this isn’t going
to happen again?

Indeed, BART said today that it had instituted the following rules, including:

No person shall conduct or participate in assemblies or demonstrations or engage in other expressive activities in the paid areas of BART stations, including BART cars and trains and BART station platforms.

What does that mean? We can’t talk?

One thing is clear, whether it’s BART or the cell phone carriers that were responsible for the shut-off, cutting off cell phone service in response to a planned protest is a shameful attack on free speech. BART officials are showing themselves to be of a mind with the former president of Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, who ordered the shutdown of cell phone service in Tahrir Square in response to peaceful, democratic protests earlier this year. Free speech advocates have called out British Prime Minister David Cameron for considering new, broad censorship powers over social networks and mobile communication in the UK, and we are appalled to see measures that go beyond anything Cameron has proposed being used here in the United States.

Cell phone service has not always been available in BART stations. The advent of reliable service inside of stations is relatively recent. But once BART made the service available, cutting it off in order to prevent the organization of a protest constitutes prior restrain on the free speech rights of every person in the station, whether they’re a protestor or a commuter. Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right. Censorship is not okay in Tahrir Square or Trafalgar Square, and it’s still not okay in Powell Street Station.

Related Issues: Free Speech


Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: